On October 6, award prize before two days in nobel prize, the name is " wonderful biology fluorescence element and curious biochemist " the article is released on the network. The discovery that the article introduced fluorescent albumen is passed and have 5 of important contribution important scientists to this job. After two days, in these 5 scientists, by the article principal next commendatory villages are repaired and Qian Yongjian won Nobel chemistry award, another scientist Sha Erfei that is alluded by the key also shared this one award.
The author of the article is Rao Yi of dean of academy of sciences of Beijing University life.
6 years ago on October 6, nobel prize announces before today, rao Yi was released through the network likewise " 21 are worth to obtain Nobel physiological or the job of medical award and scientist " one article. In the scientist that mentions in article, 3 are obtained in those days nobel prize. After that, the scientist that mentions on this list is almost annual somebody wins a prize.
Since 2002, rao Yi is already successful " forecast " gave 9 nobel prize.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : Two your articles are concerned with Nuo award. Someone says, you are undertaking forecasting to nobel prize.
Rao Yi: I write an article is scientific to current forward position research undertake an analysis, analyse what domain and scientist to be worth to win Nobel science award. My judgement has certain scientific basis, it is the scientific quality from them and them will judge to the science, effect that produces to the mankind.
Nobel prize committee has a lot of people doing these works, I am convey the self-identity in him heart to the outside, a few scientific research jobs that are worth to win Nuo award and scientist, but I am not have Nuo reward forecast. I not " predict " they are this year still win nobel prize next year, this and " be worth " winning nobel prize is not one and the same.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : Since not be " forecast " , why is the article published before you choose twice to be announced in Nuo award?
Rao Yi: Nobel prize the time that announce I know, because such meetings get,I choose to publish an article in such time is of a lot of people attention. After all, there still is many person how to be interested in science in China now.
But I am done so is not try to please the public with claptrap, I just hope to be able to build favorable intellective environment in China, pair of learning levels can be formed to have good judgement in home the ability, group that has independent judge capacity to science, always do not follow at the back of the foreigner's blindly. Chinese scientist should have him to judge scientific ability and standard, is not complete make judgement by nobel prize.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : Till this year, in 21 jobs that allude in your article, had had 9 bear the palm. Someone says, your conclude very accurate.
Rao Yi: This is not me accurate, however the selection committee of nobel prize was close to a bit with my level. I do not think, the level with scientific opinion of selection committee of their chemistry prize is higher than me. These selection committee members are not top-ranking scientist normally, a lot of moment also are not top-ranking judge member, and the last few years, chemical award often promulgates the job of biology domain, cross major to be met sometimes confine their eye shot.
Any judge are final be subjective decision, have subjective can have deviation. We cannot overestimate evaluation has much higher quality. The Chinese evaluation, evaluation of Nuo award has a problem. Nobel physiological or medical prize selection committee also goes mistake a few this years, their used gives a fault completely award, but right with the fault, committee won't admit. It is a private foundation only, not be an international organization.
Actually, international division academia also has a lot of people to have his decision criteria, won't be pulled by nobel prize committee nose goes. I also have my level, selection committee of my judgement and Nobel chemistry prize is right finally went up, explain they evaluated scientific level to rise.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : Do this say nobel prize is chosen sometimes not rigorous also?
Rao Yi: I do not feel not rigorous, explain all person competence, eye is finite however, what still have a point of view of course is different. We should realize, although Nuo award has various problems, but substantially or the progress that representing science.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : Current, body strung is evaluated in science, home and abroad, what distinction to have with western developed country especially?
Rao Yi: I think to basically have at 2 o'clock: It is we or developing country, integral science level wants all but, also can be restricted certainly on scientific evaluation, but what I want to emphasize is another important distinction, compare with photograph of a few developed countries, the regulation that we evaluate scientificly at present has a few problems.
We are very much evaluate committee, include a country highest and scientific award inside, the leader that is a few branches actually is judged together. Of course, some are scientists in these leaders, but cannot eliminate him to may hope the person of certain unit wins a prize. How can this judge a truly valuable scientific research success? On this, nobel prize evaluation of Sweden is done weller, although the scientist of their homeland also has what can win a prize sometimes, but the level has not reached level of bear the palm completely, such, they do not have candidate in the selection of nobel prize. They evaluate the person of other country, as an outsider, do not have confict of interest with oneself, award choose can mix scientificly a few fairer.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : The field that you research is a neurophysiology, but your scientific review has arrived deep include molecular biology, development biology, tumor biology, virus to learn to wait for a domain. How do you accomplish these?
Rao Yi: This results from my interest and hobby. I have strong interest to science, right science history is very interested, study to me the other something beyond the domain also can be taken care. 20 old before, I begin to read scientific document extensively, if the head is same a file library, stored the thing of a lot of respects, this also fostered me to evaluate scientific capability with the eye of judge sex stage by stage. Now, to the important discovery of international and home, I basically can choose come out.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : Annual Nuo award is announced, the Chinese wants sensitive, awkward. You think, is this kind of state of mind right incorrect?
Rao Yi: We should be awkward, and extremely should awkward. The field researchs in science, we need not be compared with the United States, want to be able to see us frequently with Japan only now the difference with world level. Till now, japan wins nobel prize ten. Arrive 9 years of 2008 from 2000 in, japan or 8 Japanese descendants scientists become Nuo award winner. They from last centuries 40 time begin, get all the time now. This explains, scientific research of Japan is close friends than us one big chunk. Someone says previously, japan does a technology not to do science only. Not be completely such, actually Japan takes the research of background science seriously very much.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : Somebody evaluates you is Chinese division academia is patristic, how do you look?
Rao Yi: The likelihood is I write an article the reason with much, much conversation. I am revealing science in different situation how beautiful, relate the story of different scientist with a variety of means, guide everybody to see next villages repair how doing, how is Qian Yongjian being done. Additional, I often say the problem of policy of our science and technology, actually a lot of people know, it is they do not say only. My opinion some are adopted, majority was not adopted. Although some of thing is not done at a draught, I still should say, also hope my student can hear my opinion. Present student is a policymaker 20 years too again.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : Is the system of science and technology of our country in what respect is restricting researcher job?
Rao Yi: Current, the question is more. Take science and technology for decision-making process, leader of blame science and technology has decision making authority, leader of science and technology has decision making authority, common administrator is influential force, personnel of multistage finance affairs has decision making authority and force. Although expert of science and technology is influential also force, but compare with other force photograph, on major problem, the expert's influence did not achieve due weight. In home, leader, financial personnel can affect the research way of brainpower.
" Beijing science and technology signs up for " : You think, how does our country study in science the respect should be done?
Rao Yi: Japanese scientific research is today's success is scored in the very long ability after accumulating. Now, our background science research is very fragile still, always became a basis in others later, we do the content from the back then. We can make one part such content, but such cannot long-term doing. This asks we do good background science, such national ability are long-term, develop continuously.
Rao Yi, famous biologist, beijing University is lifelong prexy of science of life of the professor that tell banquet, Beijing University. Studied abroad 1985 the United States, caught court academician of science of nerve of university of san Francisco California 1991. Ever waited in American Washington university, northwest university teach.
(Http://www.ebiotrade.com/ )
